On Thunderf00t, Park51 and the elusive point

AndromedasWake
AndromedasWake
Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:02 pm by AndromedasWake

This poor old blog; it just hasn’t seen much action lately. I myself have several unfinished posts in the edit bin which need attention. Hopefully the problem will atrophy as the blogging team expands before the year is out.

In the mean time, I have been blessed with a topic that’s perfect for a blog post; too big for a rant on Facebook, and too opinionated and irrelevant for a YouTube video. That topic is of course Thunderf00t’s videos about Park51. I will also be focussing on my role as a subscriber and commenter, as I have apparently become central to a debate about miscommunication.

Before getting started, I should note that I see Park51 as a complete non-issue blown up out of all proportion for the sake of sensationalism. Many of my favourite commentators on religious and rights issues have left me disappointed with the use of “they have the right but…” arguments, where what follows the “but” has been universally superfluous or just plain incorrect. False attribution, red herrings and appeals to emotion are popping up all over the place and making a mockery of the actual debate.

But of course, we all think in chorus, this is the Internet!

Read the rest of this entry »

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

theowarner
theowarner
Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:09 pm by theowarner

I’m having a peculiar thought this morning.

After a few exchanges on message boards, I’ve been directed to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy more than once in the last few days. And, today, glancing through it, I’m left with a rather odd feeling. It’s not entirely one of having found a child with his hand in the cookie jar, but more the feeling that there some of the cookies are missing.

I direct the curious reader to a few articles and I will ask a few questions. Mind you, I cannot suggest anything more than to wonder if there isn’t anything more going on here.

Read the rest of this entry »

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit

William Lane Craig Is Not Self-Authenticating

theowarner
theowarner
Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:58 pm by theowarner

In the Q&A feature on ReasonableFaith.org, William Lane Craig’s online ministry, Craig recently addressed the classic conundrum of two religious persons, a Mormon and a Fundamentalist Christian, as the case may be, each communicating a claim to an authentic experience with the Holy Spirit; the Christian must conclude, reasons the questioner, that the Mormon is “lying or mistaken,” but the argument is “reversible.” I would like to point out that I see no reason why both Mormon and Christians cannot each have an experience with the Holy Spirit; many religious traditions, in fact the majority of Christians, acknowledge that salvation is open to non-Christians, that a glimmer of grace can persist in non-Christian religious traditions, and that God can work in the hearts of all men, without compromising the essential value of the “correct” religion. But, that aside, I recognize the tension between the two seemingly incompatible claims of authentic experiences with the Holy Spirit and I recognize that for many, this tension matters; one of my subscribers, for example, recently PMed me a hypothetical dialog between a hypothetical Christian and William Lane Craig, a dialectic, capturing much of the original question from ReasonableFaith.org. The hypothetical Christian says: “My Mormon friend claims to experience the Holy Spirit, and that through this experience he knows his beliefs are true.”
Read the rest of this entry »

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit

451°C

Aught3
Aught3
Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:21 pm by Aught3

In a futuristic American city, Firemen no longer put out blazes – they start them – and the prime target for their arson are the great works of literary history. In the society of Fahrenheit 451 people fill their days by driving recklessly, watching wall-to-wall television, and listening to music through their portable iShell…er…Seashell radio sets.  The pervasive nature of vacuous entertainment is such that the citizens of this dystopian city have become wholly apathetic to the literal holocaust of the great authors carried out by Firemen. Book-burning is a repellent act and ought to be opposed by every civilised person. Not only is it a public display of censorship, something we all find offensive, but it also represents the destruction of ideas – an attempt to erase important concepts from public knowledge. No one who claims the inheritance of the enlightenment could support such an act.

Read the rest of this entry »

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit

Who are your favourite YouTube Atheists?

AndromedasWake
AndromedasWake
Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:14 pm by AndromedasWake

This Sunday 25th of July I will be hosting a special episode of the League of Reason Show on the subject of YouTube Atheism™.

Rather than invite questions from callers, this time we’re aiming to have a ’roundtable’ discussion, and rather than have to listen to boring old duffers like dprjones and AronRa, you’ll be able to hear a few of my favourite YouTube Atheists.

I’m looking forward to hearing their opinions on subjects I’ve never discussed with anyone before, but when sending out messages to the panel it got me thinking about how we choose our favourites. Who are your favourite atheists on YouTube, and why?

As usual, the show will be at 7pm GMT or THIS TIME! and we welcome you to listen in on BlogTV or THIS PLACE!

Hope to see you there!

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit

Episode IV: A New Show

AndromedasWake
AndromedasWake
Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:41 pm by AndromedasWake

YEAH!

Here are the details.

Sunday, 18th July, 7pm GMT/UTC. Click here to get the time where you are.

This week’s panel will consist of the “core” contributors; myself, AronRu, Whunderf00t, RonExodus2, and pprjones as moderator and call-monkey. As usual, highlights will appear on Youtube. I can also tell you that although the next Show is scheduled to be August 1st, next Sunday (July 25th) is also a date to put in your diary. Usual times will apply. You heard it here first!

Hope to see you all spamming the chatroom with thumbs down to pprjones!

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit

You can’t be good without sci-fi

Aught3
Aught3
Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:43 am by Aught3

Science fiction provides the perfect backdrop for exploration on the borders of morality because it creates alternate realities which are limited only by the depth of our imagination. Promising technologies can be created, controlled, and finally be seen to unexpectedly turn on their former masters. New planets can be discovered and explored for ancient civilisations or exploited for basic resources. Alien species can threaten our planet with annihilation or they can teach us what it means to be human. In the world of science fiction all these possibilities can occur; new worlds, galaxies, and alien species can be created and destroyed over and over in myriad combinations – then it can all be written again. The remoteness of these new galaxies and the unfamiliar forms of alien species allows for an ethical discussion of current events in a way that does not threaten the personal identity of those directly involved. Science fiction allows a lot of nonsense to be bypassed and lets the viewer to look directly into the heart of important subjects1.

Read the rest of this entry »

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit

LiberalViewer to discuss Copyright and Fair Use at VidCon

AndromedasWake
AndromedasWake
Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:57 pm by AndromedasWake

VidCon 2010, a conference themed around the rising internet video media phenomenon, takes place this coming weekend. I know, it’s the World Cup Final and British Grand Prix, so you won’t be seeing much of me over those two days, but something that should be of interest to all Leaguers is that Communist-Nazi-Liberal-Nazi-Scumbag LiberalViewer will be attending as a panelist to discuss the state of Copyright, YouTube’s policies, and what “fair use” really means with YouTube’s own Head of Communications and Community Policy, Victoria Grand (as well as a former EMI representative Joe Felice).

This is a great opportunity for LV to bring forward questions on behalf of the community, and that’s exactly what he’s offering to do (what a scumbag!). Even if you don’t have any questions you would like to hear asked, please head over to the video embedded below and support it. It is my hope that popularising this discussion will increase the pressure on Google to address its policy surrounding anonymous abuse of the DMCA, flagging system and rating system.

If you can cast your memory right back to January of this year, you may remember that I posted two videos on the subject. The first received widespread attention thanks to Hemant Mehta (Friendly Atheist) and PZ Myers (Pharyngula) but despite us remaining the top “technical issue”, Google have stayed suspiciously quiet.

The second video was posted in response to Google’s own invitation for site suggestions. The free speech loving community once again dominated this forum, but Google’s canned response only indicated their serious lack of understanding of the issue (and perhaps ability to read?)

Content owners who file copyright infringement notifications under the DMCA do so under penalty of perjury. When we receive a DMCA notification, we remove the posted video, send email to your registered address, and provide notice in your account. Sometimes individuals abuse the process, or are simply mistaken, because determining copyright ownership can be tricky. If you believe your content was misidentified as infringing or is a fair use, you may file a DMCA counter-notification.

Wow. Don’t they understand the word “anonymous”? We know full well how the damned thing is supposed to work Google; we’re telling you that it is open to abuse when anyone can use an unverified identity to file the notice. You know if anonymity wasn’t an option when creating an account to file such a claim, the vast majority of censorship-inspired, false DMCAs wouldn’t be filed, right?

I will be contacting LV directly with this background, just to make sure he knows how YouTube has utterly failed to respond to this issue properly in the past.


Clicky link

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • blogmarks
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit